Tuesday, September 27, 2005

On the heels of the England trial


:
Sept. 27th, 2005

More Bad Apples



Yesterday, Private First Class Lyndie England, "a 22-year old Army file clerk," was "found guilty of six counts of abuse and indecent acts" for her complicity in torturous acts at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq. England, who faces a jail term of up to 10 years, deserves to be held accountable for her behavior. But the conviction has "failed to clarify an ongoing question that has been at the center of the abuse scandal: were the low-ranking soldiers ordered to abuse detainees as part of an intelligence-gathering effort or were they simply a 'few bad apples' seeking twisted amusement?" In light of new allegations that "systematic abuse of Iraqi detainees" occurred at other facilities in Iraq, the need is clear for both an investigation to examine the role of the White House and senior officials in the Pentagon and for legislative reforms that will reaffirm America's commitment to the Geneva Conventions and the Army Field Manual.



MILITARY CHAIN OF COMMAND PASSES THE BUCK:  England is now the ninth Army reservist convicted of abusing detainees at Abu
Ghraib. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Gen. Richard Myers heralded the sentence, saying: "Pfc. England's conviction is just one more example of holding people accountable, because that's who did it." While England did not contest that she participated in abuse, her defense argued that she was following the directions of her lover and commanding military officer, then-Corporal Charles
Graner. Graner, who is serving a 10-year sentence for his role in the abuse, "has maintained that military intelligence interrogators encouraged him to mistreat detainees to get them to talk." And while Army investigative documents have revealed that military intelligence interrogators "were looking to get tough on detainees" around the time that Abu Ghraib abuses were occurring, "none of those leaders has been charged with a crime connected to the abuse." "Despite the prosecution of the reservists, only one senior officer has been reprimanded over the allegations." Gen. Janis
Karpinski, who was in operational command of Abu Ghraib, was reduced in rank to colonel, but she has since said the use of certain abuse tactics was authorized by Gen. Geoffrey Miller, the former commander of the Guantanamo Bay prison.



NEW ALLEGATIONS OF ABUSE: A Human Rights Watch report, first noted by Time magazine this past weekend, detailed allegations of three soldiers -- one officer and two non-commissioned officers -- in the 82nd Airborne who witnessed daily abuse of Iraqi detainees at Camp Mercury from September 2003 to April 2004. "Their description of routine harsh treatment of captives in Iraq parallels the abuse caught in photographs at the Abu Ghraib prison." The allegations come from one of the finest military units with a history of mission preparedness through intensified training programs. Captain Ian Fishback says he was unsuccessful for over 17 months in attempting to get the attention of military superiors. Ultimately, he approached conservative senators, including Bill
Frist, who appears to have ignored him. The types of abuse tactics employed included "severe beatings (in one incident, a soldier reportedly broke a detainee’s leg with a baseball bat), blows and kicks to the face...forced stress positions...the stacking of detainees into human pyramids; and, the withholding of food (beyond crackers) and water." In a letter to Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) revealing the abuse, Fishback said the conduct is tarnishing the U.S. image abroad. "We are America," he wrote. "Our actions should be held to a higher standard."



WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE: The prisoner abuse stems from a decision by the Bush administration dating back to the outset of the Afghanistan conflict to throw out rules that soldiers were trained to uphold (embodied in the Geneva Conventions and the U.S. Army Field Manual on Intelligence Interrogation). Instead, President Bush said only that detainees be treated "humanely," not as a requirement of the law but as policy.
Sens. McCain, Chairman of the Armed Services Committee John Warner (R-VA.), and Lindsey Graham (R-SC), another committee member, have proposed an amendment to a defense bill requiring the military to abide by the Geneva dictates. McCain is proposing another amendment that would establish the Army Field Manual as the standard for interrogation of all detainees held in Department of Defense
(DoD) custody. But the "White House [objected] to the amendments, and instructed Senate Majority leader Bill Frist to pull the whole Pentagon spending bill off the Senate floor lest the Senate pass the amendments with the bills." Human Rights Watch recommends not only passing these amendments but also creating a special commission (along the lines of the 9/11 Commission) to fully investigate the issue of detainee abuse.



A Short Film: Rosh Hashana & Katrina

Palm and Microsoft on the Windows Mobile Treo
PC World
Posted by Harry McCracken
Monday, September 26, 2005, 06:38 PM (PST)

Today's San Francisco press conference made it official: There's going to be a Windows Mobile 5.0-based Treo smartphone. It'll be available exclusively from Verizon Wireless at first, and will run on that carrier's EV-DO broadband network. But all hasn't been revealed--the execs wouldn't talk about the product's name, its price, its full specs, or its exact release date, except to say it would be available "very early" in 2006.

Many Contracts for Storm Work Raise Questions
NY Times
By ERIC LIPTON and RON NIXON

WASHINGTON, Sept. 25 - Topping the federal government's list of costs related to Hurricane Katrina is the $568 million in contracts for debris removal landed by a Florida company with ties to Mississippi's Republican governor. Near the bottom is an $89.95 bill for a pair of brown steel-toe shoes bought by an Environmental Protection Agency worker in Baton Rouge, La.

The first detailed tally of commitments from federal agencies since Hurricane Katrina hit the Gulf Coast four weeks ago shows that more than 15 contracts exceed $100 million, including 5 of $500 million or more. Most of those were for clearing away the trees, homes and cars strewn across the region; purchasing trailers and mobile homes; or providing trucks, ships, buses and planes.

More than 80 percent of the $1.5 billion in contracts signed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency alone were awarded without bidding or with limited competition, government records show, provoking concerns among auditors and government officials about the potential for favoritism or abuse.

Already, questions have been raised about the political connections of two major contractors - the Shaw Group and Kellogg, Brown & Root, a subsidiary of Halliburton - that have been represented by the lobbyist Joe M. Allbaugh, President Bush's former campaign manager and a former leader of FEMA.

"When you do something like this, you do increase the vulnerability for fraud, plain waste, abuse and mismanagement," said Richard L. Skinner, the inspector general for the Department of Homeland Security, who said 60 members of his staff were examining Hurricane Katrina contracts. "We are very apprehensive about what we are seeing."

Bills have come in for deals that apparently were clinched with a handshake, with no documentation to back them up, said Mr. Skinner, who declined to provide details.

"Most, if not all, of these people down there were trying to do the right thing," he said. "They were under a lot of pressure and they took a lot of shortcuts that may have resulted in a lot of waste."

Congress appropriated $62.3 billion in emergency financing after Hurricane Katrina struck. So far, a total of $15.8 billion has been allocated from a FEMA-managed disaster relief fund, of which $11.6 billion has been committed through contracts, direct aid to individuals or work performed by government agencies.

An examination of the contracts granted to date and interviews with state and federal officials raised concerns about some of the awards.

Some industry and government officials questioned the costs of the debris-removal contracts, saying the Army Corps of Engineers had allowed a rate that was too high. And Congressional investigators are looking into the $568 million awarded to AshBritt, a Pompano Beach, Fla., company that was a client of the former lobbying firm of Gov. Haley Barbour of Mississippi.

The investigators are asking how much money AshBritt will collect and, in turn, what it will pay subcontractors performing the work, said a House investigator who did not want her name used because she was not authorized to speak publicly about the matter.

The contracts also show considerable price disparities: travel trailers costing $15,000 to $23,000, housing inspection services that documents suggest could cost $15 to $81 per home, and ferries and ships being used for temporary housing that cost $13 million to $70 million for six months.

For some smaller companies, the recovery work will be an extraordinary test. For example, Aduddell Roofing and Sheet Metal, an Oklahoma City business run by a former steer wrestler, shares with a partner a $60 million contract to install temporary roofing on houses in Mississippi. Aduddell's single biggest contract before this was for $5 million, company executives said.

Some businesses awarded large contracts have long records of performing similar work, but they also have had some problems. CH2M Hill and the Fluor Corporation, two global engineering companies awarded a total of $250 million in contracts, were previously cited by regulators for safety violations at a weapons plant cleanup.

The Bechtel Corporation, awarded a contract that could be worth $100 million, is under scrutiny for its oversight of the "Big Dig" construction project in Boston. And Kellogg, Brown & Root, which was given $60 million in contracts, was rebuked by federal auditors for unsubstantiated billing from the Iraq reconstruction and criticized for bills like $100-per-bag laundry service. All of the companies have publicly defended their performance.

Representative Bennie Thompson of Mississippi, the ranking Democrat on the House Homeland Security Committee, complained that FEMA and other federal agencies were delivering too much of the work to giant corporations with political connections, instead of local companies or minority-owned businesses.

"There is just more of the good-old-boy system, taking care of its political allies," Mr. Thompson said. "FEMA and the others have put out these contracts in such a haphazard manner, I don't know how they can come up with anything that is accountable to the taxpayers."

As of last week, the federal government was spending more than $263 million a day on the recovery effort.

"There was a crisis situation and a lot of very quick contracting was done," said Greg Rothwell, the chief procurement officer at the Department of Homeland Security. "We will be looking at every invoice we get to make sure we were not paying extraordinary prices."

While several federal agencies have approved contracts, FEMA and the Army Corps of Engineers, by design, have spent the most so far, according to the list of contracts from federal government agencies assembled by The New York Times.

Much of the spending has been in large amounts, but the contracts also include entries like $80,000 from a company called Bama Jama for clothing adorned with the E.P.A. logo and $3,300 for Doc's Laundry and Linen in Baton Rouge.

Rapidly buying the goods and services needed to respond to an emergency is difficult for any government agency. Federal contracting rules allow agencies to approve deals without standard competitive bidding in "urgent and compelling circumstances."

To provide some safeguards, federal agencies can hold an open competition in advance for products routinely needed in emergencies. Such agreements are known as "indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity," or I.D.I.Q. contracts.

The Defense Department relied on that type of contract in assigning Kellogg, Brown & Root to perform more than $45 million in repairs to levees in New Orleans and military facilities in the gulf region.

Records show, however, that FEMA did not use this approach for the blue sheeting used to cover holes in roofs, a standard item in the disaster tool kit. Instead, the agency bought $6.6 million of the material from All American Poly of Piscataway, N.J., on Sept. 13, without full competitive bidding.

Before signing contracts with mobile-home and travel-trailer makers worth in excess of $1 billion, FEMA said it did solicit bids. But the awards were made without the standard open competition required for government contracts.

Mr. Rothwell, of the Homeland Security Department, said FEMA needed to expand its number of I.D.I.Q. agreements so that when disasters struck it could bring in contractors more quickly and at a competitive price.

The two most expensive services the government has signed contracts for so far are manufactured housing and debris removal, which alone have totaled $2 billion, according to contracting records.

The debris contracts have attracted the scrutiny of investigators from the House Homeland Security Committee, in part because of the price agreed to by the Army Corps of Engineers.

AshBritt, which has won the biggest share of those contracts, is being paid about $15 per cubic yard to collect and process debris, federal officials said. It is also being reimbursed for costs if it has to dispose of material in landfills.

But three communities in Mississippi, which found their own contractors rather than accept the terms offered by AshBritt, have negotiated contracts of $10.64 a cubic yard to $18.25 a cubic yard, including collection, processing and disposal.

And other experts have questioned AshBritt's fees. "Let me put it to you this way: If $15 was my best price, I would rebid it," said Mike Carroll, a municipal official in Orlando, Fla., with experience in hurricane cleanup.

AshBritt has cleaned up debris for FEMA and other government agencies after other hurricanes. Besides possessing a huge roster of subcontractors and the logistics expertise to route hundreds of trucks, the company is also politically well connected.

According to Senate filings, AshBritt paid about $40,000 in the first half of 2005 to Barbour Griffith & Rogers, the Washington lobbying firm co-founded by Governor Barbour of Mississippi, who is also a former chairman of the Republican National Committee.

AshBritt officials declined to comment on the Hurricane Katrina contracts. Jean Todd, a federal contracting officer who helps oversee the AshBritt deal for the Army Corps of Engineers, said she was determined to ensure that the price was fair.

"We have auditors that will be looking at all of this," Ms. Todd said.

FEMA has led the effort to line up contractors to install tens of thousand of temporary homes. The scale of the job is still unclear - depending on demand, FEMA may downsize its plans - but the agency has been rushing to buy as many travel trailers and mobile homes as it can. It has signed five contracts each worth more than $100 million with major manufacturers. And it has scoured the country, buying up whatever it can find on dealers' lots.

That has turned into a bonanza for businesses like Wagner's RV Center in Suamico, Wis., which sold 69 trailers to FEMA for $1.3 million.

"In a single sale, we cleared out most of our leftover inventory from the 2005 model year," said Leonard Wagner, the owner of the RV center. "That does not happen very often."

For some small businesses, what started off as big contracts have quickly grown into giant ones. Aduddell Roofing, the Oklahoma City business, was first hired with a partner on a $10 million contract. In a matter of weeks, that deal had grown into a $60 million contract.

The project is being run by Timothy Aduddell, the company's president, who until recently was on the professional rodeo circuit, said Ron Carte, the chief executive of Zenex International, the company that owns Aduddell.

"You have to be there to see it," Mr. Carte said of the hurricane work. "As Mr. Aduddell says, 'It's pretty cowboy.' "

Eric Dash and Leslie Eaton contributed reporting from New York for this article.


Sunday, September 25, 2005

The 'Myth' of Iraq's Foreign Fighters


By Tom Regan
The Christian Science Monitor
Friday 23 September 2005

Report by US think tank says only '4 to 10' percent of insurgents are foreigners.

The US and Iraqi governments have vastly overstated the number of foreign fighters in Iraq, and most of them don't come from Saudi Arabia, according to a new report from the Washington-based Center for Strategic International Studies (CSIS). According to a piece in The Guardian, this means the US and Iraq "feed the myth" that foreign fighters are the backbone of the insurgency. While the foreign fighters may stoke the incurgency flames, they only comprise only about 4 to 10 percent of the estimated 30,000 insurgents.

The CSIS study also disputes media reports that Saudis comprise the largest group of foreign fighters. CSIS says "Algerians are the largest group (20 percent), followed by Syrians (18 percent), Yemenis (17 percent), Sudanese (15 percent), Egyptians (13 percent), Saudis (12 percent) and those from other states (5 percent)." CSIS gathered the information for its study from intelligence services in the Gulf region.

The CSIS report says: "The vast majority of Saudi militants who have entered Iraq were not terrorist sympathisers before the war; and were radicalized almost exclusively by the coalition invasion."

The Essential Krugman: The Big Uneasy

The Essential Krugman: The Big Uneasy


The Big Uneasy
By Paul Krugman
The New York Times
Friday 23 September 2005

Although Hurricane Katrina drowned much of New Orleans, the damage to America's economic infrastructure actually fell short of early predictions. Of course, Rita may make up for that.

But Katrina did more than physical damage; it was a blow to our self-image as a nation. Maybe people will quickly forget the horrible scenes from the Superdome, and the frustration of wondering why no help had arrived, once cable TV returns to nonstop coverage of missing white women. But my guess is that Katrina's shock to our sense of ourselves will persist for years.

America's current state of mind reminds me of the demoralized mood of late 1979, when a confluence of events - double-digit inflation, gas lines and the Iranian hostage crisis - led to a national crisis of confidence.

Start with economic confidence. The available measures say that consumer confidence, which was already declining before Katrina hit, has now fallen off a cliff. One well-respected survey, from the University of Michigan, says that consumer sentiment is at its lowest level since George Bush the elder was president and "America: What Went Wrong?" was a national best seller.

It's true that gasoline prices have receded from their post-Katrina peaks. But even if Rita spares the refineries, a full recovery of economic confidence seems unlikely. For one thing, it looks as if we're in for a long, cold winter: natural gas and fuel oil are still near their price peaks. Anyway, most families were already struggling even before Katrina. A few weeks ago, the Census Bureau reported that in 2004, while Washington and Wall Street were hailing a "Bush boom," poverty increased, and median family income failed to keep up with inflation. And it's safe to assume that most families did even worse this year.

Then there's the war in Iraq, which is rapidly becoming impossible to spin positively: the purple fingers have come and gone, and there are no more corners to turn. As a result, views that people like Howard Dean were once derided for are becoming the majority opinion. Most Americans say the war was a mistake; a majority say the administration deliberately misled the country into war; almost 4 in 10 say Iraq will turn into another Vietnam.

And many people are outraged by the war's cost. The general public doesn't closely follow economists' arguments about the risks of budget deficits, or try to decide between competing budget projections. But people do know that there's a big deficit, that politicians keep calling for cuts in spending and that rebuilding after Katrina will cost a lot of money. They resent the idea that large sums are being spent in a faraway country, where we're waging a war whose purpose seems increasingly obscure.

Finally, fragmentary evidence - like a sharp drop in the fraction of Americans who approve of President Bush's performance in handling terrorism and the failure of large crowds to show up for the Pentagon's "America Supports You" march and country music concert - suggests that the confluence of Katrina and the fourth anniversary of 9/11 has caused something to snap in public perceptions about the "war on terror."

In the early months after 9/11, America's self-confidence actually seemed to have been bolstered by the attack: the Taliban were quickly overthrown, and President Bush looked like an effective leader. The positive perception of what happened after 9/11 has, needless to say, been a mainstay of Mr. Bush's political stature.

But now that more time has elapsed since 9/11 than the whole stretch from Pearl Harbor to V-J Day, people are losing faith. Osama, it turns out, could both run and hide. It's obvious from the evening news that Al Qaeda and violent Islamic extremism in general are flourishing.

And the hapless response to Katrina, which should have been easier to deal with than a terrorist attack, has shown that our leaders have done virtually nothing to make us safer.

And here's the important point: these blows to our national self-image are mutually reinforcing. The sense that we're caught in an unwinnable war reinforces the sense that the economy is getting worse, and vice versa. So we're having a general crisis of confidence.

It's the kind of crisis that opens the door for dramatic political changes - possibly, but not necessarily, in a good direction. But who will provide leadership, now that Mr. Bush is damaged goods?

Eagles - Desperado - Lyrics



Desperado, why don't you come to your senses,
You've been out ridin fences for so long now,
Oh and you're a hard one,
but I know that you've got your reasons,
The things that are pleasin you can hurt you somehow.

Don't you draw the queen of diamonds boy,
she'll beat you if she's able.
You know the queen of hearts is always your best bet.
Now it seems to me some fine things have been laid upon your table,
But you only want the ones you can't get.


Desperado, you ain't gettin no younger,
Your pain and your hunger, they're drivin you home,
And freedom, oh freedom, well that's just some people talkin.
Your prison is walking through this world all alone.

Don't your feet get cold in the wintertime,
The sky won't snow and the sun won't shine,
It's hard to tell the nighttime from the day.
And you're losin all your highs and lows,
Ain't it funny how the feelin goes away?

Desperado, why don't you come to your senses,
Come down from your fences- open the gates.
It may be rainin, but there's a rainbow above you.
You'd better let somebody love you,
LET SOMEBODY LOVE YOU.
You'd better let somebody love you,
before it's too late.

Friday, September 23, 2005

The Essential Krugman: Tragedy in Black and White

The Essential Krugman: Tragedy in Black and White


SYNOPSIS: A discussion of the ugly truth about race and the lethally inept Katrina response

By three to one, African-Americans believe that federal aid took so long to arrive in New Orleans in part because the city was poor and black. By an equally large margin, whites disagree.

The truth is that there's no way to know. Maybe President Bush would have been mugging with a guitar the day after the levees broke even if New Orleans had been a mostly white city. Maybe Palm Beach would also have had to wait five days after a hurricane hit before key military units received orders to join rescue operations.

But in a larger sense, the administration's lethally inept response to Hurricane Katrina had a lot to do with race. For race is the biggest reason the United States, uniquely among advanced countries, is ruled by a political movement that is hostile to the idea of helping citizens in need.

Race, after all, was central to the emergence of a Republican majority: essentially, the South switched sides after the passage of the Civil Rights Act. Today, states that had slavery in 1860 are much more likely to vote Republican than states that didn't.

And who can honestly deny that race is a major reason America treats its poor more harshly than any other advanced country? To put it crudely: a middle-class European, thinking about the poor, says to himself, "There but for the grace of God go I." A middle-class American is all too likely to think, perhaps without admitting it to himself, "Why should I be taxed to support those people?"

Above all, race-based hostility to the idea of helping the poor created an environment in which a political movement hostile to government aid in general could flourish.

By all accounts Ronald Reagan, who declared in his Inaugural Address that "government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem," wasn't personally racist. But he repeatedly used a bogus tale about a Cadillac-driving Chicago "welfare queen" to bash big government. And he launched his 1980 campaign with a pro-states'-rights speech in Philadelphia, Miss., a small town whose only claim to fame was the 1964 murder of three civil rights workers.

Under George W. Bush - who, like Mr. Reagan, isn't personally racist but relies on the support of racists - the anti-government right has reached a new pinnacle of power. And the incompetent response to Katrina was the direct result of his political philosophy. When an administration doesn't believe in an agency's mission, the agency quickly loses its ability to perform that mission.

By now everyone knows that the Bush administration treated the Federal Emergency Management Agency as a dumping ground for cronies and political hacks, leaving the agency incapable of dealing with disasters. But FEMA's degradation isn't unique. It reflects a more general decline in the competence of government agencies whose job is to help people in need.

For example, housing for Katrina refugees is one of the most urgent problems now facing the nation. The FEMAvilles springing up across the gulf region could all too easily turn into squalid symbols of national failure. But the Department of Housing and Urban Development, which should be a source of expertise in tackling this problem, has been reduced to a hollow shell, with eight of its principal staff positions vacant.

But let me not blame the Bush administration for everything. The sad truth is that the only exceptional thing about the neglect of our fellow citizens we saw after Katrina struck is that for once the consequences of that neglect were visible on national TV.

Consider this: in the United States, unlike any other advanced country, many people fail to receive basic health care because they can't afford it. Lack of health insurance kills many more Americans each year than Katrina and 9/11 combined.

But the health care crisis hasn't had much effect on politics. And one reason is that it isn't yet a crisis among middle-class, white Americans (although it's getting there). Instead, the worst effects are falling on the poor and black, who have third-world levels of infant mortality and life expectancy.

I'd like to believe that Katrina will change everything - that we'll all now realize how important it is to have a government committed to helping those in need, whatever the color of their skin. But I wouldn't bet on it.

PowerPoint Photo Presentation of Katrina


Strong photos of New Orleans disaster

PowerPoint 3.6mb Presentation

Wednesday, September 21, 2005

Want to know why America is viewed so unfavorably?

From: Container-Recycling.Org
"In 2001, 285 million Americans failed to recycle some 51 billion aluminum beverage cans - enough to encircle the Earth 153 times if laid end-to-end. That same year, 451 million residents of 18 European nations wasted only 8.9 billion cans. Also in 2001, over 65% of the US Population had access to curside recycling.

"Americans produce 1.31 tons/year/person of garbage (national average)"

Waste Production



  • In the U.S., 4.39 pounds of trash per day and up to 56 tons of trash per year are created by the average person.

  • Only about one-tenth of all solid garbage in the United States gets recycled.

  • Every year we fill enough garbage trucks to form a line that would stretch from the earth, halfway to the moon.

  • Each day the United States throws away enough trash to fill 63,000 garbage trucks.

  • Almost 1/3 of the waste generated the U.S. is packaging.

  • Diapers: An average child will use between 8,000 -10,000 disposable diapers ($2,000 worth) before being potty trained. Each year, parents and babysitters dispose of about 18 billion of these items. In the United States alone these single-use items consume nearly 100,000 tons of plastic and 800,000 tons of tree pulp. We will pay an average of $350 million annually to deal with their disposal and, to top it off, these diapers will still be in the landfill 300 years from now. Americans throw away 570 diapers per second. That's 49 million diapers per day.

  • Americans throw away 2.5 million plastic bottles every hour.

  • Every year, Americans make enough plastic film to shrink-wrap the state of Texas.

  • The amount of glass bottles Americans throw away every two weeks would have filled both World Trade Center towers.

  • Americans throw away enough aluminum cans to rebuild our commercial air fleet every three months, and enough iron and steel to supply all our nation's automakers every day.

  • Throwing away one aluminum can wastes as much energy as if that can were 1/2 full of gasoline.

  • In the U.S., an additional 5 million tons of waste is generated during the holidays. Four million tons of this is wrapping paper and shopping bags.

  • Americans receive almost 4 million tons of junk mail every year. Most of it winds up in landfills.

  • The average American uses 650 pounds of paper a year.

  • Each year, Americans trash enough office paper to build a 12-foot wall from Los Angeles to New York City.

  • Americans toss out enough paper & plastic cups, forks and spoons every year to circle the equator 300 times.

  • The average American office worker goes through around 500 disposable cups every year.

  • Nearly 44 million American workers purchase or eat lunch out every weekday.

  • Americans make nearly 400 billion photocopies a year - about 750,000 copies every minute of every day.

  • U.S. fax machines sent 30 billion faxes in 1990.

  • U.S. businesses now use about 21 million tons of paper every year. That's about 175 pounds of paper for each American.

  • Enough hazardous waste is generated in one year to fill the New Orleans Superdome 1,500 times over.

  • New York City alone throws out enough garbage each day to fill the Empire State Building.

  • In one day, Americans get rid of 20,000 cars and 4,000 trucks and buses.

  • As of 1992, 14 billion pounds of trash were dumped into ocean annually around the world.

  • Forty-three thousand tons of food is thrown out in the United States each day.

  • Americans throw out about 270 million tires every year.

  • Sixty-five billion aluminum soda cans are used each year.



-According to a 1997 study by US Department of Agriculture's Economic Research Service (ERS) entitled "Estimating and Addressing America's Food Losses", about 96 billion pounds of food, or more than a quarter of the 356 billion pounds of edible food available for human consumption in the United States, was lost to human use by food retailers, consumers, and foodservice establishments in 1995.

Fresh fruits and vegetables, fluid milk, grain products, and sweeteners (mostly sugar and high-fructose corn syrup) accounted for two-thirds of the losses. 16 billion pounds of milk and 14 billion pounds of grain products are also included in this loss.

In 2002, the world's passenger car fleet hit 531 million. A quarter of these cars were in the United States, a country with just five percent of the world's population, and a long known love affair for the automobile. The average car in the US travels 10 percent more each year than a car in the United Kingdom, about 50 percent more than one in Germany, and almost 200 percent more than a car in Japan.

In 2005, North Americans comprised 5.1% of the worlds population, and accounted for 23.8% of all Internet users. Asia comprised 56.4% of the worlds population, and accounted for 34.5% of all global Internet users. Approximately 32% of North Americans do not use the Internet.

Poll: Census data belie public beliefs on immigration
Arizonans appear to overestimate count of undocumented
Paul Davenport
Associated Press
Sept. 20, 2005 12:00 AM

PHOENIX - A new survey indicates that many Arizonans overestimate how many Hispanics, who represent one of every four state residents, are undocumented immigrants and underestimate how many are U.S. citizens.

Maricopa County adults surveyed by the Behavior Research Center estimated that 39 percent of Arizona Hispanics are undocumented immigrants. But the 2000 U.S. census found 24 percent of Arizona Hispanics to be non-citizens, a grouping that also includes foreign nationals who are legally in the United States.

Those surveyed also estimated that 47 percent of Arizona Hispanics are native-born U.S. citizens, significantly below the 64 percent indicated by census figures. Those figures also indicated that an additional 8 percent of Arizona Hispanics are naturalized citizens, the center said Monday.

The Southern Poverty Law Center's Intelligence Project counted 762 active hate groups in the United States in 2004.Note: With South Carolina and New Jersey being the States with the highest concentration of hate groups. North and South Dakota, and New Mexico were the only States without such a group.

In the past fifty years, the US Government has actively participated in the overthrow of governments in Venezuela, Cuba, Iran, Guatemala, Peru, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Brazil, Bolivia, Panama, Indonesia, Afganistan, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Guyana, Haiti, Dominican Republic, Zaire, Angola, Mozambique, and Iraq. We have propped up vile dictators such as Noriega, Mobutu, Marcos, Suharto, and the Shah of Iran among others.

"[Americans] are regularly told by politicians and the media, that America is the world's most generous nation. This is one of the most conventional pieces of 'knowledgeable ignorance'. According to the OECD, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, the US gave between $6 and $15 billion in foreign aid in the period between 1995 and 1999. In absolute terms, Japan gives more than the US, between $9 and $15 billion in the same period.

But the absolute figures are less significant than the proportion of gross domestic product (GDP, or national wealth) that a country devotes to foreign aid. On that league table, the US ranks twenty-second of the 22 most developed nations. As former President Jimmy Carter commented: 'We are the stingiest nation of all'. Denmark is top of the table, giving 1.01% of GDP, while the US manages just 0.1%. The United Nations has long established the target of 0.7% GDP for development assistance, although only four countries actually achieve this: Denmark, 1.01%; Norway, 0.91%; the Netherlands, 0.79%; Sweden, 0.7%.

Apart from being the least generous nation, the US is highly selective in who receives its aid. Over 50% of its aid budget is spent on middle-income countries in the Middle East, with Israel being the recipient of the largest single share". Note: Source is: "Why do people hate America?" by Ziauddin Sardar and Merryl Wyn Davies, 2002. p79


Tuesday, September 20, 2005

Public Beliefs About Evolution and Creation

From Religious Tolerance Website

Political science professor George Bishop of the University of Cincinnati published a paper in 1998-AUG listing and interpreting 1997 poll data. "Bishop notes that these figures have remained remarkably stable over time. These questions were first asked about 15 years ago, and the percentages in each category are almost identical. Moreover, the profiles of each group has been constant. Just as when these questions were first asked 15 years ago, creationists continue to be older, less educated, Southern, politically conservative, and biblically literal (among other things). Women and African-Americans were more likely to be creationists than whites and men. Meanwhile, younger, better educated, mainline Protestants and Catholics were more likely to land in the middle as theistic evolutionists."

With the elderly representing a gradually increasing part of the U.S. population, one would expect that the creationist view would receive increasing support. In fact, there appears to be a gradual erosion of support for the creationist view. It is barely statistically significant. The sample size is about 1,000 so the sampling error is within +/- 3.2%, 19 times out of 20. It will take a decade or two to determine if a significant shift has really happened.

By any measure, the United States remains a highly religious nation, compared to other developed countries. And its citizens tend to hold more conservative beliefs. For example, the percentage of adults who believe that "the Bible is the actual word of God and it is to be taken literally, word for word" is 5 times higher in the U.S. than in Britain. Church attendance is about 4 times higher in the U.S. than it is in Britain. Similarly, according to one opinion poll, belief that "Human beings developed from earlier species of animals..." is much smaller in the United States (35%) than in other countries (as high as 82%).

Senate Panel Hears Concerns About Eminent Domain Ruling


NY Times
By DAVID STOUT
Sept. 20, 2005

WASHINGTON, Sept. 20 - Members of the Senate Judiciary Committee listened sympathetically today to people who face the loss of their homes or their churches to make way for economic development.

"What is happening to me should not happen to anyone," Susette Kelo told the lawmakers. "Congress and state legislatures need to send a message to local governments that this kind of abuse of power will not be funded or tolerated."

Ms. Kelo is one of 15 homeowners in New London, Conn., whose properties have been condemned by the city so that private developers can build a residential, retail and office complex along the Thames River. City officials have maintained that the development would help return the hard-pressed community to prosperity.

The city's right to acquire the homes was upheld in June by the United States Supreme Court, which ruled, 5 to 4, that fostering economic development is an appropriate use of the government's power of eminent domain, which had traditionally been used to acquire land for roads, bridges and other public works.

Not the New Deal

The Essential Krugman: Not The New Deal


NY Times Op-Ed
By PAUL KRUGMAN
Published: September 16, 2005

Now it begins: America's biggest relief and recovery program since the New Deal. And the omens aren't good.

It's a given that the Bush administration, which tried to turn Iraq into a laboratory for conservative economic policies, will try the same thing on the Gulf Coast. The Heritage Foundation, which has surely been helping Karl Rove develop the administration's recovery plan, has already published a manifesto on post-Katrina policy.



It calls for waivers on environmental rules, the elimination of capital gains taxes and the private ownership of public school buildings in the disaster areas. And if any of the people killed by Katrina, most of them poor, had a net worth of more than $1.5 million, Heritage wants to exempt their heirs from the estate tax.



Still, even conservatives admit that deregulation, tax cuts and privatization won't be enough. Recovery will require a lot of federal spending. And aside from the effect on the deficit - we're about to see the spectacle of tax cuts in the face of both a war and a huge reconstruction effort - this raises another question: how can discretionary government spending take place on that scale without creating equally large-scale corruption?



It's possible to spend large sums honestly, as Franklin D. Roosevelt demonstrated in the 1930's. F.D.R. presided over a huge expansion of federal spending, including a lot of discretionary spending by the Works Progress Administration. Yet the image of public relief, widely regarded as corrupt before the New Deal, actually improved markedly.



How did that happen? The answer is that the New Deal made almost a fetish out of policing its own programs against potential corruption. In particular, F.D.R. created a powerful "division of progress investigation" to look into complaints of malfeasance in the W.P.A. That division proved so effective that a later Congressional investigation couldn't find a single serious irregularity it had missed.



This commitment to honest government wasn't a sign of Roosevelt's personal virtue; it reflected a political imperative. F.D.R.'s mission in office was to show that government activism works. To maintain that mission's credibility, he needed to keep his administration's record clean.



But George W. Bush isn't F.D.R. Indeed, in crucial respects he's the anti-F.D.R.



President Bush subscribes to a political philosophy that opposes government activism - that's why he has tried to downsize and privatize programs wherever he can. (He still hopes to privatize Social Security, F.D.R.'s biggest legacy.) So even his policy failures don't bother his strongest supporters: many conservatives view the inept response to Katrina as a vindication of their lack of faith in government, rather than as a reason to reconsider their faith in Mr. Bush.



And to date the Bush administration, which has no stake in showing that good government is possible, has been averse to investigating itself. On the contrary, it has consistently stonewalled corruption investigations and punished its own investigators if they try to do their jobs.



That's why Mr. Bush's promise last night that he will have "a team of inspectors general reviewing all expenditures" rings hollow. Whoever these inspectors general are, they'll be mindful of the fate of Bunnatine Greenhouse, a highly regarded auditor at the Army Corps of Engineers who suddenly got poor performance reviews after she raised questions about Halliburton's contracts in Iraq. She was demoted late last month.



Turning the funds over to state and local governments isn't the answer, either. F.D.R. actually made a point of taking control away from local politicians; then as now, patronage played a big role in local politics.



And our sympathy for the people of Mississippi and Louisiana shouldn't blind us to the realities of their states' political cultures. Last year the newsletter Corporate Crime Reporter ranked the states according to the number of federal public-corruption convictions per capita. Mississippi came in first, and Louisiana came in third.



Is there any way Mr. Bush could ensure an honest recovery program? Yes - he could insulate decisions about reconstruction spending from politics by placing them in the hands of an autonomous agency headed by a political independent, or, if no such person can be found, a Democrat (as a sign of good faith).



He didn't do that last night, and probably won't. There's every reason to believe the reconstruction of the Gulf Coast, like the failed reconstruction of Iraq, will be deeply marred by cronyism and corruption.



American
Progress Report: Sept. 20th, 2005


Top Bush Official Arrested in Corruption Probe



David Safavian, who until Friday headed the "obscure but extremely important" federal procurement office in the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB), was arrested yesterday, accused by federal agents of "lying and obstructing a criminal investigation into Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff's dealings with the federal government." In his position at the OMB, Safavian set purchasing policy for the entire government, and "had recently been working on developing contracting policies for the multibillion-dollar relief effort after Hurricane Katrina." His arrest -- the "first criminal complaint filed against a government official" in the ongoing Abramoff probe -- exposes a thicket of corruption involving
Abramoff, leaders of the right-wing movement like Grover Norquist and Ralph Reed, and public officials at the very highest levels of government, including House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-TX).



LYING ABOUT ETHICS TO SEND KICK-BACKS TO ABRAMOFF: The complaint filed by the FBI accuses Safavian of making "repeated false statements to government officials and investigators" about a golf trip with Abramoff to Scotland in 2002, when Safavian was chief of staff at the Bush administration's General Services Administration. In that position, "ethics rules flatly prohibited the receipt of a gift from any person seeking an official action by the agency," and before the golf trip, Safavian assured GSA ethics officers in writing that Abramoff "has no business before GSA." In truth, Safavian was already actively assisting Abramoff "acquire control of two federally managed properties in the Washington area;" a 40-acre plot that became the campus for a Hebrew school Abramoff founded, and office space that Abramoff was seeking to lease for his Indian tribal clients. Indeed, on the very same day Safavian sent the letter to the GSA ethics office, "he sent an e-mail to Abramoff from his home computer, advising him how to 'lay out a case for this lease.'" The day before he departed to Scotland, Safavian "arranged a meeting for Abramoff's wife and business partner with officials at GSA" to tour of one of the properties -- a tour that Abramoff suggested after being shown a map of the space in Safavian's office. And in an email to a colleague, Abramoff himself explained why he'd invited Safavian on the golfing trip: "Total business angle. He is new (chief of staff) of GSA."



TRAINED BY THE MASTER: "Like Abramoff, Safavian is a veteran Washington player," the Washington Post reports. The two worked closely together at the lobbying firm Preston, Gates & Ellis, where "Abramoff schooled Safavian" and where they "jointly represented a broad swath of gambling interests." The two also held Shaw Environmental and Infrastructure (part of the Shaw Group) as a client, which is now represented by former FEMA chief and 2000 Bush-Cheney campaign manager Joe Allbaugh. (The Securities and Exchange Committee has launched an investigation into the Shaw Group for possible accounting irregularities, Newsweek reported this weekend. Shaw scored a $100 million no-bid Katrina contract "before the flood waters receded.") Safavian moved on to found Janus Merritt, a top-end lobbying firm, with "Abramoff's college roommate and conservative maverick Grover Norquist."



THE BUSH CONNECTION: Some of Jack Abramoff's most heinous work was on behalf of the government of the Northern Mariana Islands, a U.S. territory between Hawaii and the Philippines. Human "brokers" bring thousands there to work as sex slaves and in cramped sweatshop garment factories where clothes (complete with "Made in USA" tag) are made for several brand names. Working with
Safavian, Abramoff lobbied various public officials, particularly Rep. Tom DeLay, to prevent any crack-down on the worker abuse on the island. In January 2001, when President Bush entered office, Abramoff wrote island officials, "Our standing with the new administration promises to be solid as several friends of the
[Marianas] will soon be taking high-ranking positions in the Administration." He was right. Two members of Abramoff's lobbying team subsequently received positions in the Bush White House, one as assistant secretary of labor, and another -- David Safavian -- as chief of staff to the General Services Administration. In the first 10 months of Bush's presidency, Abramoff and his lobbying team "logged nearly 200 contacts with the new administration." They pressed for "friendly hires" and lax labor laws with officials as high up as Attorney General John Ashcroft and policy advisers in Vice President Dick Cheney's office, and it apparently worked: the islands "fended off proposals in 2001 to extend the U.S. minimum wage to island workers and gained at least $2 million more in federal aid from the administration." By mid-2003, Abramoff "had raised at least $100,000 for Mr. Bush's re-election campaign, becoming one of Bush's famed 'pioneers.'"



THE MIKE BROWN OF CONTRACT PROCUREMENT: Two weeks after Safavian was confirmed in June 2004, Steven
Kelman, the federal procurement administrator under President Clinton, told Government Executive magazine that Safavian "doesn't have a lot of background in procurement, so the hope is that he's a good learner." Allan
Burman, another former procurement chief, agreed: "I don't know where David Safavian comes out on [acquisition reform]." Even Angela Styles, who held the top acquisition post in the Bush administration until September 2003, said Safavian had "no apparent philosophy" on procurement issues.



ALL IN THE FAMILY: Safavian's arrest also places a spotlight on his wife, Jennifer Safavian, who works for Rep. Tom Davis (R-VA). Davis chairs the House Government Reform Committee, and Jennifer Safavian serves as chief counsel for oversight and investigations (she reportedly "has signed a recusal agreement that will keep her from looking into OMB and procurement matters"). Nevertheless, according to Hill columnist Josh Marshall, Rep. Davis pushed through several "made-to-order crony-empowerment (a.k.a., contracting deregulation and streamlining) provisions" in the Katrina emergency funding bills. When David Safavian was first nominated, the Federal Times warned that if he were confirmed, "it would be difficult to believe - if only because of appearances - that he or his wife's committee is acting independently of the other as each tends to the integrity of the federal procurement process."



Sunday, September 18, 2005

Georgia's New Poll Tax


NY Times

Sept 12th, 2005



In 1966, the Supreme Court held that the poll tax was unconstitutional. Nearly 40 years later, Georgia is still charging people to vote, this time with a new voter ID law that requires many people without driver's licenses - a group that is disproportionately poor, black and elderly - to pay $20 or more for a state ID card. Georgia went ahead with this even though there is not a single place in the entire city of Atlanta where the cards are sold. The law is a national disgrace.



Until recently, Georgia, like most states, accepted many forms of identification at the polls. But starting this month, it is accepting only government-issued photo ID's. People with driver's licenses are fine. But many people without them have to buy a state ID card to vote, at a cost of $20 for a five-year card or $35 for 10 years. The cards are sold in 58 locations, in a state with 159 counties. It is outrageous that Atlanta does not have a single location. (The state says it plans to open one soon.) But the burden is also great on people in rural parts of the state.



The Republicans who pushed the law through, and Gov. Sonny Perdue, also a Republican, who signed it, say that it is intended to prevent fraud. But it seems clear that it is about keeping certain people away from the polls, for political advantage. The vast majority of fraud complaints in Georgia, according to its secretary of state, Cathy Cox, involve absentee ballots, which are unaffected by the new law. Ms. Cox says she is unaware of a single documented case in recent years of fraud through impersonation of a voter at the polls.



Citizens who swear they are indigent are exempt from the fee. But since the law does not define who is indigent, many people may be reluctant to swear and risk a criminal penalty. More important, the 24th Amendment, which outlawed poll taxes in federal elections, and the Supreme Court's decision striking down state poll taxes applied to all Americans, not just to the indigent. A Georgian who votes only in presidential elections, and buys a five-year card to do so, would be paying $10 per election. That is no doubt more than many people on fixed incomes, who struggle to get by but are not legally indigent, are willing to pay to vote.



If Georgia's law remains in place, other states are likely to follow. There is also growing concern among voting-rights advocates that a self-appointed election reform commission, led by James Baker, the former secretary of state who played a troubling role in the disputed 2000 election, and former President Jimmy Carter, may be about to propose national voter ID standards that would similarly make it harder for poor people and blacks to vote.



The American Civil Liberties Union is planning to challenge Georgia's law. It will have several strong legal claims, starting with the 24th Amendment. The Supreme Court said in 1966, in striking down the poll tax, that "the right to vote is too precious, too fundamental to be so burdened." It still is.

Friday, September 16, 2005

Buying Cleaner Energy


Few People Realize the Potential
eMagazine Sept. 2005
by Starre Vartan


Turning off unused lights, insulating your house and buying energy-efficient appliances are all great ways to save energy, which decreases air pollution and saves you money in the process. And if everyone were truly conservation-minded, we would save thousands of megawatt-hours of electricity every day. But now you can go a step further. Without buying any equipment or making any changes to your house, you can purchase clean energy from non-polluting sources (you’ve got to keep your soymilk cold somehow). The problem is, not many people are choosing “green power,” though it’s available in every state.

It may seem confusing at first, but when you buy green power it doesn’t necessarily mean the electricity you actually receive comes directly from a wind turbine or solar panel. That’s because the nature of the grid means that all power—green or not—is combined. Instead, the amount of clean power you buy is generated on your behalf and added to the larger pool of electricity. You still receive your power through your home’s same wires and local grid.

“A switching program through your utility means that your power company buys a REC (renewable energy credit) for your power, and that power is added to the grid,” explains Bob Wall, New England’s regional director for Smartpower, which is a Connecticut-based nonprofit marketing campaign working to promote energy produced by solar, wind and hydrothermal sources. “While it’s a little tough to explain, it’s really easy to do,” says Wall. “Just call your utility and ask.”

Thursday, September 15, 2005

The Smoking Gun: FEMA & New Orleans Advance Planning

Tuesday, September 13, 2005

The Hazards of Pot Revealed

Friday, September 09, 2005

A modest proposal

Given:

1. President Bush was elected as the President of the United States of America and will serve until Jan. 2009, or approximately 1,230 days from today.
>
2.The Presidential order of succession is:
* The Vice President Richard Cheney
* Speaker of the House John Dennis Hastert
* President pro tempore of the Senate Ted Stevens
* Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice
* Secretary of the Treasury John Snow
* Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld
* Attorney General Alberto Gonzales
* Secretary of the Interior Gale A. Norton
* Secretary of Agriculture Mike Johanns
* Secretary of Commerce Carlos Gutierrez
* Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao
* Secretary of Health and Human Services Mike Leavitt
* Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Alphonso Jackson
* Secretary of Transportation Norman Yoshio Mineta
* Secretary of Energy Samuel Bodman
* Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings
* Secretary of Veterans Affairs Jim Nicholson
* Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff

3. Prayer has proven to be ineffective in stopping a bullet, causing flood waters to recede, enticing God to appear "in the flesh", or curing pancreatic cancer, thus humanity requires physical actions to meet Maslow's first-stage needs. Prayer alone cannot physically move a grain of sand.

4. Upper level management of City, State, and Federal agencies is almost exclusively a matter of political attachment and patronage. There is no mandatory skill set, training, experience, or proven ability required to head countless agencies of Government.

5. Individuals who take advantage of disaster to rob, rape, or otherwise physically assault innocents deserve summary judgement up to an including execution, according to a long history of religious and common law.

6. Unresolved anger:"Therefore “anger” is an indication that there is something wrong that needs to be corrected, there is an abuse that must stop, there is an un-addressed issue that is causing pain and suffering which must be dealt with. Put in another way, anger is an indication that there is an unresolved issue that is keeping life from being perfect and therefore is keeping someone from enjoying life and relationships! If this anger is resolved, it can become a tremendous source of energy and creativity. But if left unresolved, it becomes depressive, debilitating, and even violent."

7. A dichotomy has been created in the United States, where power, prestige, affluence, honor, responsibility, and sacrifice have migrated into two camps: those that have it, and those that don't. Blacks have it if they are entertainers, whether minstrels or professional athletes. Whites have it if they attained it by inheritance, by innate ability, by acculturation, by good looks, or by misappropriation. The ranks of the have-nots have been increasing much faster than that of the haves. The more sharply delineated these two groups become, the more fragile becomes our democracy.

8. Patronage is not always a bad thing, as long as the inductee is better than, equal to, or almost as good as the person they are destined to replace, and it does function as a reward to supporters of the ruling person or party. However, when the inductee has no training, no experience, no proven abilities, and no support in the agency they are selected to manage, it is the worst kind of civic disaster; especially if the agency is charged with protecting the lives and well-being of those it is empowered to assist.

9. America's "Melting Pot", "Evening News", "the common good", and "the average citizen" are becoming extinct as defining entities, with hardening social boundaries becoming the standard mode of civil interactions. Worse yet, the Federal Government is seen as the active arm of separation, rather than championing the Roman notion of the citizen.

10. America has seen five years of George W. Bush's Presidency, and it's innumerable short-comings, but cannot do a damn thing to alter the "facts on the ground".

11. So, what to do now? Engage in local action? Move to Canada, (which given the rate of global warming will require of Americans in the future), continue to get agitated for another three plus years, drop out figuratively or literally, or revolt. It's hard to say; but just going with the flow is going to be a really hard way to deal with circumstances. God help us that some charlatan doesn't appear to lead America off the deep end. Losing this exquisite experiment would be a huge waste of human capital.

Wednesday, September 07, 2005

Gag me with a spoon!!
FEMA's Website is Spin City

Note: Just go there and look at the website and you will see exactly why the three top men in the agency held their jobs: they had more experience in politics and advertising than they did in ANY area of crisis management, reconstruction, civil defense, military affairs, etc. Just like several other federal agencies, they are headed by flaks and syncophants for the Bush Administration, not by seasoned professionals with expertise in their departments operations. Plus, again, like Iraqui contractors, they were there as 'managers' to provide a pipeline of federal resources to 'those selected' to provide government funds and services. Patronage Sucks !!

FEMA's Failures

Center
for American Progress Report: Sept. 07, 2005




FEMA's Failures



The more you know about the federal government's response to Hurricane Katrina, the worse it gets. Last night, the Associated Press reported that FEMA Director Michael Brown "waited hours after Hurricane Katrina struck the Gulf Coast before he proposed to his boss sending at least 1,000 Homeland Security workers into the region to support rescuers." According to internal documents obtained by the AP, Brown specified that part of the workers mission would be to "'convey a positive image' about the government's response for victims" to the public. While it was sent five hours after the storm hit, Brown's letter lacked any sense of urgency -- he requested the workers arrive within two days. The letter politely ended, "Thank you for your consideration in helping us to meet our responsibilities." Last week, President Bush praised Brown's efforts, telling him "Brownie, you're doing a heckuva job."



TOP FEMA DEPUTIES MAKE BROWN LOOK QUALIFIED: Before joining FEMA, Brown "spent 11 years as the commissioner of judges and stewards for the International Arabian Horse Association, a breeders' and horse-show organization based in Colorado." (Brown was forced out "after a spate of lawsuits over alleged supervision failures.") Brown's top deputies, however, make him look qualified. The number two at
FEMA, Chief of Staff Patrick Rhode, was an event planner ("advance man") for Bush's presidential campaign. He had absolutely no emergency management experience before joining
FEMA. The number three at FEMA, Deputy Chief of Staff Scott Morris, was a press flak at the Bush campaign. He previously worked for Maverick Media, the firm that produced TV spots for Bush's campaigns. Morris also has no emergency management experience. In contrast, the top deputies of Clinton-era FEMA Director James Lee Witt ran regional FEMA offices for at least three years before assuming senior positions in Washington."



FEMA DIVERTS VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS TO SERVE AS BACKDROP FOR BUSH: Responding to an urgent plea from New Orleans Mayor
Ray Nagin, more than a thousand firefighters volunteered to travel to Louisiana to help out. The firefighters thought they were "going to be deployed as emergency workers," but FEMA decided to use them as "community-relations officers." Many of them spent their time passing out fliers with the FEMA phone number. (Shelly Miller, a Mississippi resident whose trailer was severely damaged in the storm, said, "We tried calling
FEMA. You can’t get through on the phone lines.
") For 50 of the firefighters, their first assignment was "to stand beside President Bush as he tours devastated areas." Many firefighters expressed their disappointment with their role. FEMA spokeswoman Mary Hudak said any firefighter that criticized the agency should "revisit his commitment to
FEMA, to firefighting and to the citizens of this country."



FEMA COVERS ITS TRACKS: FEMA's slow and incompetent response to Hurricane Katrina put thousands of people in danger. The agency doesn't want the public to see the human devastation. An agency spokeswoman said, "
We have requested that no photographs of the deceased be made by the media." FEMA also rejected "journalists' requests to accompany rescue boats searching for storm victims."







Bush Pledges to Investigate Himself



President Bush announced yesterday that he will conduct an investigation into "what went wrong" with his own administration's response to Hurricane Katrina. Though "the call for an investigation was unusual coming from a president who rarely admits mistakes," many saw the announcement for what it was: a public relations stunt meant to relieve the administration from the "relentless political fire over the federal response to Hurricane Katrina." Bush's remarks led to concern that the White House self-analysis will merely be a form of the "blame game" that the White House publicly rebukes -- that is, an effort to place blame on state and local officials for the slow response.



BUSH PLEDGES TO INVESTIGATE HIMSELF:  Press Secretary Scott McClellan, following up on the president's comments about investigating what went wrong, said, "We're going to have a thorough analysis of the response efforts." The White House's announcement amounted to little more than a public relations stunt, given that McClellan was unable to provide any specifics as to how the investigation will be conducted. In fact, the White House was able to provide more information about actions that will not be taken. McClellan tamped down any expectation that the "thorough analysis" would be conducted anytime soon; he said, "now is not the time to do that." Also, "McClellan was unclear about whether Bush would look into his own actions and vague about ... how the investigation would start, and rejected questions about whether the president should fire anyone responsible for the problems."



WHITE HOUSE PLAYING ITS OWN BLAME GAME: The White House continued to suggest that blame for the "woefully inadequate" response to Hurricane Katrina lies at the feet of state and local officials. Last weekend, the New York Times reported on an orchestrated effort being led by Karl Rove and Dan Bartlett that "sought to move the blame for the slow response to Louisiana state officials." The Financial Times reported that Bush took a step in that direction yesterday, suggesting "'bureaucratic obstacles' from state and local officials were partly to blame." But when the questions turned to White House accountability, Bush said he refused to play "the blame game" that others want him to play (and McClellan repeated that talking point at least six times at the press briefing). CNN commentator Jack Cafferty cut through the spin: "Why are we talking about the 'blame game' -- there are thousands of people dead because government officials failed to do what they're supposed to be doing. That's criminal behavior. I mean, that's no game."



CALL FOR INDEPENDENT COMMISSION: Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) called for the creation of an independent commission to investigate government lapses in an effort to ensure the proper lessons have been learned. Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) echoed the call for something "comparable to the 9/11 Commission." Former 9/11 Commission member Tim Roemer said the federal government's response was "inexcusable" and similarly called for the formation of "a commission to look into the mistakes." The White House initially rejected calls for the creation of a 9/11 Commission, proffering a familiar complaint that it would become a forum for "finger-pointing," as Ari Fleischer stated in the 10/11/02 White House press briefing. Similarly, Bush is again resisting calls for the creation of such a Katrina commission out a desire to avoid "finger pointing or politics," but is instead dispatching Vice President Cheney to the Gulf Coast region to relieve concerns that lessons are being learned. Bush said that deploying Cheney (who has been missing in action), a move which the Los Angeles Times sarcastically heralded as a sign that now we know Bush is serious, will help him determine whether he is meeting his goals.












Under the Radar



VALUES -- SANTORUM JOINS THE LIST OF NON-COMPASSIONATE CONSERVATIVES: In a weekend interview, Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA) said Hurricane Katrina victims who stayed behind may need to
be subject to greater penalties than they are already experiencing. Santorum said, "There may be a need to look at tougher penalties on those who decide to ride it out and understand that there are consequences to not leaving." Santorum failed to understand that many who stayed behind lacked "a car or bus fare to escape ahead of time." Yesterday, Santorum amended his proposal for tougher penalties, suggesting those who lacked cars or other resources would be exempt. Santorum's lack of compassion for hurricane victims is the latest in a line that has come from right-wingers, including Bill O'Reilly, Dennis Hastert, Michael Chertoff, and Michael Brown.



ADMINISTRATION -- "OPERATION BLESSING" IN DISGUISE: Americans who visited FEMA's website in search of relief organizations last week found the group "Operation Blessing" listed right below the American Red Cross. Operation Blessing is the "aid" group run by televangelist Pat Robertson. As one might guess, the group's reputation is as respectable as its figurehead. "Back in 1994," the New York Sun reports, "during the infamous Rwandan genocide, Robertson used his 700 Club's daily cable operation to appeal to the American public for donations to fly humanitarian supplies into Zaire to save the Rwandan refugees." Relief supplies weren't the only thing the Operation Blessing planes were ferrying. "An investigation conducted by the Virginia attorney general's office concluded in 1999 that the planes were mostly used to transport mining equipment for a diamond operation run by a for-profit company called African Development Corp." Operation Blessing was removed from FEMA's website a few days ago.




If you're not mad as hell about this, you're not paying attention.

Osama and Katrina

Osama and Katrina


NY TImes Op-Ed
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN
Published: September 7, 2005

On the day after 9/11, I was in Jerusalem and was interviewed by Israeli TV. The reporter asked me, "Do you think the Bush administration is up to responding to this attack?" As best I can recall, I answered: "Absolutely. One thing I can assure you about these guys is that they know how to pull the trigger."

It was just a gut reaction that George Bush and Dick Cheney were the right guys to deal with Osama. I was not alone in that feeling, and as a result, Mr. Bush got a mandate, almost a blank check, to rule from 9/11 that he never really earned at the polls. Unfortunately, he used that mandate not simply to confront the terrorists but to take a radically uncompassionate conservative agenda - on taxes, stem cells, the environment and foreign treaties - that was going nowhere before 9/11, and drive it into a post-9/11 world. In that sense, 9/11 distorted our politics and society.

Well, if 9/11 is one bookend of the Bush administration, Katrina may be the other. If 9/11 put the wind at President Bush's back, Katrina's put the wind in his face. If the Bush-Cheney team seemed to be the right guys to deal with Osama, they seem exactly the wrong guys to deal with Katrina - and all the rot and misplaced priorities it's exposed here at home.

These are people so much better at inflicting pain than feeling it, so much better at taking things apart than putting them together, so much better at defending "intelligent design" as a theology than practicing it as a policy.

For instance, it's unavoidably obvious that we need a real policy of energy conservation. But President Bush can barely choke out the word "conservation." And can you imagine Mr. Cheney, who has already denounced conservation as a "personal virtue" irrelevant to national policy, now leading such a campaign or confronting oil companies for price gouging?

And then there are the president's standard lines: "It's not the government's money; it's your money," and, "One of the last things that we need to do to this economy is to take money out of your pocket and fuel government." Maybe Mr. Bush will now also tell us: "It's not the government's hurricane - it's your hurricane."

An administration whose tax policy has been dominated by the toweringly selfish Grover Norquist - who has been quoted as saying: "I don't want to abolish government. I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub" - doesn't have the instincts for this moment. Mr. Norquist is the only person about whom I would say this: I hope he owns property around the New Orleans levee that was never properly finished because of a lack of tax dollars. I hope his basement got flooded. And I hope that he was busy drowning government in his bathtub when the levee broke and that he had to wait for a U.S. Army helicopter to get out of town.

The Bush team has engaged in a tax giveaway since 9/11 that has had one underlying assumption: There will never be another rainy day. Just spend money. You knew that sooner or later there would be a rainy day, but Karl Rove has assumed it wouldn't happen on Mr. Bush's watch - that someone else would have to clean it up. Well, it did happen on his watch.

Besides ripping away the roofs of New Orleans, Katrina ripped away the argument that we can cut taxes, properly educate our kids, compete with India and China, succeed in Iraq, keep improving the U.S. infrastructure, and take care of a catastrophic emergency - without putting ourselves totally into the debt of Beijing.

So many of the things the Bush team has ignored or distorted under the guise of fighting Osama were exposed by Katrina: its refusal to impose a gasoline tax after 9/11, which would have begun to shift our economy much sooner to more fuel-efficient cars, helped raise money for a rainy day and eased our dependence on the world's worst regimes for energy; its refusal to develop some form of national health care to cover the 40 million uninsured; and its insistence on cutting more taxes, even when that has contributed to incomplete levees and too small an Army to deal with Katrina, Osama and Saddam at the same time.

As my Democratic entrepreneur friend Joel Hyatt once remarked, the Bush team's philosophy since 9/11 has been: "We're at war. Let's party."

Well, the party is over. If Mr. Bush learns the lessons of Katrina, he has a chance to replace his 9/11 mandate with something new and relevant. If that happens, Katrina will have destroyed New Orleans, but helped to restore America. If Mr. Bush goes back to his politics as usual, he'll be thwarted at every turn. Katrina will have destroyed a city and a presidency.

Tuesday, September 06, 2005

Katrina Progress Report: Sept. 6th, 2005


Katrina Progress Report: Sept. 6th, 2005

Rove's Finger Pointing



On Thursday, White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan said, "This
is not a time to get into any finger pointing or politics
or anything of
that nature." Apparently, Karl Rove didn't get the message. The New York
Times reports that Rove and White House communications director Dan Bartlett
have "rolled out a
plan this weekend to contain the political damage
from the administration's
response to Hurricane Katrina." The core of the strategy is "to shift
the blame away from the White House and toward officials of New Orleans and
Louisiana."



SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL LIES TO WASHINGTON POST: The Washington
Post, citing an anonymous "senior administration official," reported
on Sunday that Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Blanco "still
had not declared a state of emergency
." That wasn't true. Hours later
the Post ran a correction, acknowledging that Blanco "declared an emergency
on Aug. 26." (Read it here.)
Newsweek also reported that, as late as Sept. 1, Blanco was "hesitant
to declare martial law or a state of emergency
, which would have opened the
door to more Pentagon help." The magazine has yet to issue a correction.



ADMINISTRATION ACKNOWLEDGED RESPONSIBILITY FOR RELIEF EFFORTS: The White
House effort to shift the blame for the response to Katrina contradicts its
public statements before the storm hit. An Aug. 27 declaration on the White
House website "authorizes
the Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA),
to coordinate all disaster relief efforts.
" The order specifies that
"FEMA is authorized to identify, mobilize, and provide at its discretion,
equipment and resources necessary to alleviate the impacts of the
emergency." Jane Bullock, former FEMA chief of staff, said, "The
moment the president declared a federal disaster, it became a federal
responsibility
.… The federal government took ownership over the
response." This is consistent with the DHS website which states
plainly, "In the event of a terrorist attack, natural disaster or other
large-scale emergency, the Department of Homeland Security will assume primary
responsibility ... for ensuring that emergency response professionals are
prepared for any situation. This will entail providing
a coordinated, comprehensive federal response to any large-scale crisis and
mounting a swift and effective recovery effort
."



BUSH TRIES TO SHIFT BLAME: Now that things have gone poorly, the White
House wants to pretend it wasn't in charge. President Bush said the magnitude of
the storm "has created
tremendous problems that have strained state and local capabilities
. The
result is that many of our citizens simply are not getting the help they need,
especially in New Orleans. And that is unacceptable." Dan Bartlett told the
Washington Post, "The
federal government stands ready to work with state and local officials
to
secure New Orleans and the state of Louisiana. The president will not let any
form of bureaucracy get in the way of protecting the citizens of
Louisiana." The message from Bush and Bartlett is that state officials were
"slow
to call for outside help
." The reality is that Louisiana state
officials reached out to the federal government for assistance before the
storm hit. On Aug. 27, Gov. Blanco sent a detailed letter to President Bush
requesting assistance because "this
incident is of such severity and magnitude that effective response is beyond the
capabilities of the State and affected local governments
, and that
supplementary Federal assistance is necessary to save lives, protect property,
public health, and safety, or to lessen or avert the threat of a disaster."





Not Prepared For Another 9/11



In just five days, Americans will mark the four-year anniversary of 9/11. Many
will ask the question: are we prepared for another terrorist attack? The
response to Hurricane Katrina has demonstrated that there are many concerns
about our nation's disaster preparedness. Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) has
given the Department of Homeland Security and the federal government's response
to the hurricane disaster so far a
grade of "F.
" Sen. Jon Kyl, chairman of the Senate Judiciary
subcommittee that oversees homeland security, has expressed concern about our
nation's ability to respond to a terrorist strike. "I
am not at all confident, based on what we've seen, that we'd have the ability to
handle that
," Kyl said.



INABILITY TO ASSESS TRUE THREATS:
In 2001, prior to 9/11, the Federal
Emergency Management Agency ranked a major hurricane strike on New Orleans as
"among the
three likeliest, most catastrophic disasters facing this country
,"
directly behind a terrorist strike on New York City. A few months later,
terrorists struck New York City, and President Bush's response in the first few
hours to that disaster was "flatfooted"
and "awkward."
Bush later acknowledged to Bob Woodward that he had
not been "on
point
" prior to 9/11 about the threat of an attack. In admitting last
week that the response to Katrina by the federal government was "unacceptable,"
concerns arose anew about the Bush administration's inattention to true threats.
Instead of focusing on the identified threats, the administration, as Michael
Lind notes, focused
its priorities on Iraq




ADMINISTRATION UNDERMINES CONFIDENCE IN NATION'S PREPAREDNESS:
The
take-away lesson to many observers from the hurricane response was clear: Katrina
shows we're not ready for catastrophe
. "This damage could
just as easily have been caused by a terrorist attack
, and many if not most
of the same elements are involved in responding to natural disasters," Sen. Kyl
said.  Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-MS) told CNN (9/2),
"our government failed in both its preparedness and its response to the
disaster. If terrorists rather than a hurricane had attacked, the result would
have been no different." And according to Nikolai Spassky, the deputy
secretary of the Russian Security Council, terrorists took notice. The response
to Hurricane Katrina sent "an
extremely unpleasant signal
" about the U.S.'s ability to cope with
disaster, said Spassky. Even House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, though unwilling
to acknowledge the administration's poor response to the hurricane, has said the
nation's terrorism preparedness needs a thorough review
.



KATRINA HAMPERS ABILITY TO RESPOND TO TERRORIST
ATTACK:
"If
this was a terrorist event, is this the kind of response we would have?
"
asked James Lee Witt, the FEMA director under Clinton. The administration has
struck the wrong balance between providing safety against terrorist attacks and
preparing for natural disasters. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
spends
$1.1 billion

each year for states to combat terrorism, but just
$180 million

to help prepare for disasters such as Katrina
. The total cost of the
catastrophe is now expected to exceed $100
billion
. Furthermore, as the National Guard is pulled into hurricane
recovery duty, it is being strained
and stretched as never before
. While FEMA and DHS previously over-committed
their resources to terrorism rather than disaster preparedness
, the current
crisis has left the federal government hobbled in its response to both. As response
units
across America switch
gears
from counter-terrorism to hurricane recovery, even
administration-backers like Newt Gingrich are left wondering: "if
we can’t respond faster than this to an event we saw coming across the gulf
for days, then why do we think we’re prepared to respond to a nuclear or
biological attack?
” Despite the fact that Bush claims we have "plenty
of resources
" to secure the homeland and recover from the hurricane,
experts such as former Homeland Security Deputy Secretary Admiral James Loy
candidly admit, "I
can't tell you that we're lock, stock and ready to go
."

Monday, September 05, 2005

Essential Krugman: A Can't-Do Government

A Can't-Do Government


NY Times Op-Ed
By PAUL KRUGMAN
Published: September 2, 2005

Before 9/11 the Federal Emergency Management Agency listed the three most likely catastrophic disasters facing America: a terrorist attack on New York, a major earthquake in San Francisco and a hurricane strike on New Orleans. "The New Orleans hurricane scenario," The Houston Chronicle wrote in December 2001, "may be the deadliest of all." It described a potential catastrophe very much like the one now happening.

Note: A NOAA/FEMA public meeting in New Orleans in 2000 pointed out the peril of New Orleans almost exactly as has happened with the Katrina Hurricane. In that meeting the following phrase appeared: "The IPCC previously ranked New Orleans as the North American city most vulnerable to the impact of climate change. At the University we are doing what we can to understand our local climate system, rising sea levels, and impacts to costal communities for better mitigation," said Gregory O'Brien, Chancellor, University of New Orleans.

So why were New Orleans and the nation so unprepared? After 9/11, hard questions were deferred in the name of national unity, then buried under a thick coat of whitewash. This time, we need accountability.

First question: Why have aid and security taken so long to arrive? Katrina hit five days ago - and it was already clear by last Friday that Katrina could do immense damage along the Gulf Coast. Yet the response you'd expect from an advanced country never happened. Thousands of Americans are dead or dying, not because they refused to evacuate, but because they were too poor or too sick to get out without help - and help wasn't provided. Many have yet to receive any help at all.

There will and should be many questions about the response of state and local governments; in particular, couldn't they have done more to help the poor and sick escape? But the evidence points, above all, to a stunning lack of both preparation and urgency in the federal government's response.

Even military resources in the right place weren't ordered into action. "On Wednesday," said an editorial in The Sun Herald in Biloxi, Miss., "reporters listening to horrific stories of death and survival at the Biloxi Junior High School shelter looked north across Irish Hill Road and saw Air Force personnel playing basketball and performing calisthenics. Playing basketball and performing calisthenics!"

Maybe administration officials believed that the local National Guard could keep order and deliver relief. But many members of the National Guard and much of its equipment - including high-water vehicles - are in Iraq. "The National Guard needs that equipment back home to support the homeland security mission," a Louisiana Guard officer told reporters several weeks ago.

Second question: Why wasn't more preventive action taken? After 2003 the Army Corps of Engineers sharply slowed its flood-control work, including work on sinking levees. "The corps," an Editor and Publisher article says, citing a series of articles in The Times-Picayune in New Orleans, "never tried to hide the fact that the spending pressures of the war in Iraq, as well as homeland security - coming at the same time as federal tax cuts - was the reason for the strain."

In 2002 the corps' chief resigned, reportedly under threat of being fired, after he criticized the administration's proposed cuts in the corps' budget, including flood-control spending.

Third question: Did the Bush administration destroy FEMA's effectiveness? The administration has, by all accounts, treated the emergency management agency like an unwanted stepchild, leading to a mass exodus of experienced professionals.

Last year James Lee Witt, who won bipartisan praise for his leadership of the agency during the Clinton years, said at a Congressional hearing: "I am extremely concerned that the ability of our nation to prepare for and respond to disasters has been sharply eroded. I hear from emergency managers, local and state leaders, and first responders nearly every day that the FEMA they knew and worked well with has now disappeared."

I don't think this is a simple tale of incompetence. The reason the military wasn't rushed in to help along the Gulf Coast is, I believe, the same reason nothing was done to stop looting after the fall of Baghdad. Flood control was neglected for the same reason our troops in Iraq didn't get adequate armor.

At a fundamental level, I'd argue, our current leaders just aren't serious about some of the essential functions of government. They like waging war, but they don't like providing security, rescuing those in need or spending on preventive measures. And they never, ever ask for shared sacrifice.

Yesterday Mr. Bush made an utterly fantastic claim: that nobody expected the breach of the levees. In fact, there had been repeated warnings about exactly that risk.

So America, once famous for its can-do attitude, now has a can't-do government that makes excuses instead of doing its job. And while it makes those excuses, Americans are dying.

Friday, September 02, 2005

The List of Organizations Accepting Donations and Volunteers,
as posted on the FEMA Website for Hurrican Katrina relief
.

Note: With only two exceptions, all are religious organizations. Why then is FEMA splitting the categories to "Donate Cash", and "Donate Cash and/or Volunteers" while listing ASH and OB ahead of other relief agencies with considerably more expertise, experience, and staff?

More on Leadership


From TPM Cafe Blog
Sept. 1, 2005

"I am afraid Gen. Clark's post does not agree with my experience of the last five years. As reluctant as I am to criticise in any way such a distinguished poster, he is using a rhetorical form I have become very tired of. I call it "praising with faint damns". We most certainly have had leadership in the last five years. Every topic he mentions involved a radical departure from previous administrations. In every one of those areas these radical changes were consciously made, and presented to the American public and finally, made the policy of this administration. Is that not leadership?

We did not find ourselves in a war with Iraq- we were led into it. Our policy was changed to one of pre-emption, the "facts" which demanded an invasion were presented to the public and the leadership of the legislature, and an invasion launched. Is that not leadership? On the energy bill a decision to forego steps toward energy independence was made, and the bill was voted upon. Leadership. The failures in preparing for the hurricane were all conscious decisions made over several years. Priorities were decided on and resources allocated. Leadership.

And so on. Perhaps Gen Clark is trying to be diplomatic, but I have seen no lack of leadership. In every case a direction, whether it was to make an unprovoked invasion, establish a badly planned agency, remove oversight, hire based on ideology or cronyism, tolerate or even encourage corruption, smear or fire critics, were all policy decisions, and honestly or not, involved an administration leading in directions they most certainly were aware of. "Lack of leadership" may be a polite way of putting it, but our President is not an adolescent with inadequate parental supervision (although Dad seems to have stepped in to try and bail him out, again).

The more apropriate words for the actions of the Bush administration are malfeasance, corruption, criminal behavior, and lies, lies, lies. Possibly even treason. It's hard for me to envision Gen. Clark as a leader of the nation until he is willing to call these things by their right names. Would he call the memos and decisions which led to the torture of detainees "lack of leadership"? No, the Bush administration led our Armed Forces to the use of torture. Or did we just slip into it when no one was looking?

If we don't start calling things by their right names, the men and women who led the US into these policies, because these things were in their interest, will lead us there again and again. In every case, from energy to Iraq to disaster relief, we were led, not honestly, but led, to these policies because they benefitted people and their interests. We have had some amazing leadership. It has led us to the position we are in today."

Thursday, September 01, 2005

The Outrage Is There

Gen. Wesley Clark's article, and blogger responses on TPM Cafe about the failure of leadership, and the sub-standard responses by the entire Bush Administration.

Life in the Bottom 80 Percent


NY Times Editorial
Published: September 1, 2005

Economic growth isn't what it used to be. In 2004, the economy grew a solid 3.8 percent. But for the fifth straight year, median household income was basically flat, at $44,389 in 2004, the Census Bureau said Tuesday. That's the longest stretch of income stagnation on record.

Economic growth was also no elixir for the 800,000 additional workers who found themselves without health insurance in 2004. Were it not for increased coverage by military insurance and Medicaid, the ranks of the uninsured - now 45.8 million - would be even larger. And 1.1 million more people fell into poverty in 2004, bringing the ranks of poor Americans to 37 million.

When President Bush talks about the economy, he invariably boasts about good economic growth. But he doesn't acknowledge what is apparent from the census figures: as the very rich get even richer, their gains can mask the stagnation and deterioration at less lofty income levels.

This week's census report showed that income inequality was near all-time highs in 2004, with 50.1 percent of income going to the top 20 percent of households. And additional census data obtained by the Economic Policy Institute show that only the top 5 percent of households experienced real income gains in 2004. Incomes for the other 95 percent of households were flat or falling.

Income inequality is an economic and social ill, but the administration and the Congressional majority don't seem to recognize that. When Congress returns from its monthlong summer vacation next week, two of the leadership's top priorities include renewing the push to repeal the estate tax, which affects only the wealthiest of families, and extending the tax cuts for investment income, which flow largely to the richest Americans. At the other end of the spectrum, lawmakers have stubbornly refused to raise the minimum wage: $5.15 an hour since 1997. They will also be taking up proposals for deep budget cuts in programs that ameliorate income inequality, like Medicaid, food stamps and federal student loans.

They should be ashamed of themselves.


September 1, 2005
Waiting for a Leader


NY Times Editorial

George W. Bush gave one of the worst speeches of his life yesterday, especially given the level of national distress and the need for words of consolation and wisdom. In what seems to be a ritual in this administration, the president appeared a day later than he was needed. He then read an address of a quality more appropriate for an Arbor Day celebration: a long laundry list of pounds of ice, generators and blankets delivered to the stricken Gulf Coast. He advised the public that anybody who wanted to help should send cash, grinned, and promised that everything would work out in the end.

We will, of course, endure, and the city of New Orleans must come back. But looking at the pictures on television yesterday of a place abandoned to the forces of flood, fire and looting, it was hard not to wonder exactly how that is going to come to pass. Right now, hundreds of thousands of American refugees need our national concern and care. Thousands of people still need to be rescued from imminent peril. Public health threats must be controlled in New Orleans and throughout southern Mississippi. Drivers must be given confidence that gasoline will be available, and profiteering must be brought under control at a moment when television has been showing long lines at some pumps and spot prices approaching $4 a gallon have been reported.

Sacrifices may be necessary to make sure that all these things happen in an orderly, efficient way. But this administration has never been one to counsel sacrifice. And nothing about the president's demeanor yesterday - which seemed casual to the point of carelessness - suggested that he understood the depth of the current crisis.

While our attention must now be on the Gulf Coast's most immediate needs, the nation will soon ask why New Orleans's levees remained so inadequate. Publications from the local newspaper to National Geographic have fulminated about the bad state of flood protection in this beloved city, which is below sea level. Why were developers permitted to destroy wetlands and barrier islands that could have held back the hurricane's surge? Why was Congress, before it wandered off to vacation, engaged in slashing the budget for correcting some of the gaping holes in the area's flood protection?

It would be some comfort to think that, as Mr. Bush cheerily announced, America "will be a stronger place" for enduring this crisis. Complacency will no longer suffice, especially if experts are right in warning that global warming may increase the intensity of future hurricanes. But since this administration won't acknowledge that global warming exists, the chances of leadership seem minimal.

Note: G.W.Bush may just be unlucky to preside over America when so many things we have taken for granted as a Nation have turned out completely contrary to our historically indicated expectations. But at some point, one must begin to entertain the notion that Mr. Bush is just not the man for the job, and unfortunately his Vice President is even less capable of leading this country than he is. We probably need to begin considering a change to our national chant: from "God Bless America" to "God Have Mercy On America".

Some things President Bush and his Administration cannot do, nor are they responsible for a long string of substandard outcomes and forecasts for the future of America and the World. But he most certainly -IS- responsible for several policies and practices that are contrary to the best interests of our country. The worst part of this is we cannot do a damn thing about it until at least January 2009 !

Ok; but Why are People Choosing to Live There?


1. San Francisco Region
"Earthquakes in the San Francisco Bay Region result from strain energy constantly accumulating across the region because of the northwestward motion of the Pacific Plate relative to the North American Plate (Figure 2). The region experienced large and destructive earthquakes in 1838, 1868, 1906, and 1989, and future large earthquakes to relieve this continually accumulating strain are a certainty. For our study we define the SFBR as extending from Healdsburg on the northwest to Salinas on the southeast. It encloses the entire metropolitan area, including its most rapidly expanding urban and suburban areas. We have used the term "major" earthquake as one with M>=6.7 (where M is moment magnitude). As experience from recent earthquakes in Northridge, California (M6.7, 1994, 20 killed, $20B in direct losses) and Kobe, Japan (M6.9, 1995, 5500 killed, $147B in direct losses), earthquakes of this size can have a profound impact on the social and economic fabric of densely urbanized areas."

2. Anniston, Alabama
"These are the neighborhoods closest to the Anniston Army Depot, where the Army began burning obsolete but deadly chemical weapons this month. Toxins such as sarin and VX nerve gas — the very weapons of mass destruction that have been so much in the news lately — will be destroyed at the depot over the next seven years.

Emergency management authorities have set up the following zones around the incinerator at Anniston Army Depot, where the Army is burning chemical weapons: Pink Zone: Closest to the depot. Extends about 6 miles. Residents offered protective hoods, portable air filter units and shelter-in-place kits: Duct tape, plastic sheeting, a towel, a videotape and scissors. About 35,000 people live here.

Immediate response zone: Extends 6-9 miles. About 40,000 residents offered air filter units and shelter-in-place kits. Protective action zone: From 9 miles to county's border. About 41,00 residents offered shelter-in-place kits. If an accident occurred that sent a toxic cloud into the air, the pink zone would be Ground Zero. In an eerie preview of what life might be like in a future chemical attack by terrorists, people who live within 6 miles of the incinerator have been issued protective plastic hoods, portable air filters, duct tape and plastic and told to prepare a "safe room" in their homes.

3. Alabama and Oklahoma:
Both States experience an average of four or more severe tornadoes per year.

4. Interstate 10 Corridor
The most hazardous Interstate corridor in the US, from hurricanes in Florida to earthquakes in California, including the only Zone IV grade tornado area in Texas running near Houston. From Houston eastward through the Gulf States to Florida this interstate handles a significant quantity of freight. In Texas one of the consequences of this is:

"There were 881 crashes along I-10 East and within a quarter mile of the road, an average of 2.4 crashes per day. On a per-mile basis, there were about 14.1 crashes per mile along the 63-mile stretch of I-10 East. Several locations were identified along I-10 East that had a higher-than-average number of crashes in the 1998 database. These locations include the East Belt interchange (51 crashes) and the intersections with Sheldon Road (43) and Cedar Bayou (44). It has been estimated that close to 80 percent of the freeway crashes in Houston involve large trucks. It is likely that the high concentration of industrial uses in the area and the associated volume of heavy truck traffic along I-10 are part of the overall safety concern of the corridor."

5. Volcanos in Washington State

Not only the well-known site of Mount St. Helens, but also: Mount Adams, Mount Baker, Glacier Peak, and Mount Ranier all of which have experienced significant volcanic activity during the past fifty years. With respect to Mount Ranier, which has experienced two significant seismic activity occurrances in the past fifty years, , two towns, Packwood and Ashford lie within ten miles, and are directly in the path of large lahars, which will totally destroyed the towns and everything in it if Ranier were to "blow". Total population of Snohomish County is over 600 thousand people.

6. Gulf Coast Hurricanes

Almost the entire Gulf Coast from Houston, Texas, to Jacksonville, Florida lies in a flood plain. In a majority of areas, the land is less than six inches higher than the adjacent Gulf waters. More than half of all US hurricanes, and over three quarters of the hurricanes to hit land in the US during the past hundred years have crossed the Gulf Coast. While the death toll from US hurricanes has been declining in the past hundred years, the economic impact has been rising, with Katrina having an estimated $22 billion impact on the Gulf Coast. Hurricane Andrew in 1992 cost in excess of $25 billion in 2005 adjusted dollars. Almost 12 million people live in the Gulf Coast region.

7. The Maldives
The highest point in the Maldives is 2.4 meters above sea level. With the anticipated rise in sea levels during the next fifty years, it is certain that over 90% of the 300 square kilometers of the Maldives will be underwater. The 350,000 current residents will have to find some other place to live.

8. Mexico City
The largest city in the world, with a population of 23 million inhabitants has one of the worst standard-of-living measurements. "The World Health Organization, the United Nations Program for the Environment and Greenpeace all agree that Mexico City has the worst level of air pollution of any major urban area in the world. Adding to the city's problems is the devastating recession that hit all of Mexico after the December 1994 peso crisis, bringing the capital massive poverty and an unprecedented urban crime wave".

Politics in Mexico City is a classic example of selective enforcement of Federal laws, rampant bribery, vastly inadequate social services, and an almost total lack of urban planning or resource management. The 1995 earthquake, and the eruption of the Popocatepetl volcano in 1998 also demonstrated that Mexico City is geologically unstable.
Note: All of the above, and more, raise the simple question: "Why do people choose to continue living in these areas given the hazards?" Do they {shudder} share any responsibility for their choice when bad things happen? Does the family in Kansas who has lost two homes to tornadoes but plans on staying and rebuilding a third home in the same area deserve to be commended, or lambasted, for their choice?

I can't answer that; but I know from personal experience growing up in a North Florida mill town that I could never accept spending my life there, constricted by its provincialism. I didn't like the prospect of going to work in the pulp mill, of living my adult life in such a small room. So I moved, to New York...at the age of fifteen...solamente singolare. So have countless others. While in New York I met a dozen immigrants from Yugoslavia who told harrowing tales of the efforts they took to escape their native lands and come to America. Immigrants to Australia and Israel could plan on a measure of state assistance for their re-settlement in their new homeland. Other migration choices were considerably more demanding.